A series of recent court cases (including one in Australia) show a rather interesting pattern in matters concerning condition, correctness and value of old cars. These days, numbers have to be consistent, it seems, be the car a Corvette or a Ford Falcon. Those giving a value for a vehicle--especially if they have never actually touched the car--are getting themselves into bad situations due to the up/down impact the economy has on sales of old cars. For a number of years, I have referred people to things like the OLD CARS PRICE GUIDE with published prices based on actual sales, etc, to get an idea of prices indexed to vehicle condition.
More and more buyers of old cars are using the courts as a remedy if they feel they have been cheated in a sale. More and more sellers are finding things like "somebody told me it was worth that much", "the guy I got it from said it was all original", and the old concept of "let the buyer beware (Caveat Emptor)" is not the sturdy defense it used to be.
Professional appraisers (the good ones) have to go to school for the basics of pricing old vehicles and be able to access resource materials with specific details on makes/years, etc.
Any thoughts on all this?
?