Author Topic: Engine Conversions  (Read 42235 times)

HJ-ETEX

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 640
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: Engine Conversions
« Reply #60 on: December 10, 2010, 09:33:37 PM »
Well if you SAY it is a Ford 250... A Ford 250 based on the small 6 cylinder design (144/170/200) was offered on the Mustang/Torino after 1970 when these cars went to a body/frame from a unibody design. Since almost all of these cars had V8s, the 250 is a rare item. I wish I had one. Ford could have easily used the bigger 240/300 6 in these cars since no one would have bought one anyway.
KFOCI VP 2001-2005
1951 Kaiser Deluxe /327 Chevy
1951 Kaiser Deluxe (no funny stuff)
1968 Kaiser Commando V6
1961 Willys 2WD 134 F-Head SW
1963 Kaiser FC170

FrazerWill

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 153
    • View Profile
Re: Engine Conversions
« Reply #61 on: December 10, 2010, 11:08:56 PM »

FrazerWill

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 153
    • View Profile
Re: Engine Conversions
« Reply #62 on: December 10, 2010, 11:10:13 PM »

Logan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 891
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: Engine Conversions
« Reply #63 on: December 13, 2010, 12:08:58 AM »
Frazerwill, love the Mustang--really awesome how you've set up the l6 for speed!

FrazerWill

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 153
    • View Profile
Re: Engine Conversions
« Reply #64 on: December 13, 2010, 10:36:14 PM »
Not me, but I like these motors...

Logan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 891
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: Engine Conversions
« Reply #65 on: December 15, 2010, 12:33:03 PM »
Oh, anyway, that's a pretty cool set-up.  I generally keep everythint stock on my vehicles, but I have toyed with the idea of getting a pretty beat up 51-53 Kaiser and stripping it down and seeing what kind of performance I could get out of the 226 superesonic.  I wouldn't do anything fancy with the body (no abilities there!), just remove weight and increase HP.  Think it would be fun--maybe some day!

dusty

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 303
    • MSN Messenger - mr_blueberry30@hotmail.com
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: Engine Conversions
« Reply #66 on: January 10, 2011, 11:32:13 PM »
Does anyone have information on the AMC V8 that supposedly was a Kaiser design, the early AMC had an gm hydro on it and seems reading the spec, that it was a barn burner 307 at that time . It was in the Ambassidor and Marlin And rebel.

Jim B PEI

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 442
  • People want simple answers, even if they are wrong
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: Engine Conversions
« Reply #67 on: January 10, 2011, 11:43:13 PM »
I thought that the Kaiser design was nominally a 288--AMC with the help of the Kaiser engineers (think A V Roe/Avro Arrow/Canada's inadvertent boost to NASA) came out with a 287? CID a couple of years later. The AMC 327 was later based on that, wasn't it? I have forgotten the history of AMC V8 engines, and what derived from what, and all I remember now is the 343 and 360, and wasn't there a pre-cursor 304?. The only 307 I remember is in the Chev 265/283/307/327/350 etc family.
KF
49 Kaiser Special Glass Green, Saskatchewan new
Studebaker
64 2dr 170-6 auto Astra White Commander Special
63 4dr Wagonaire 259V8 o/d Blue
57 4dr 185-6 auto Glendale Green/Turquoise
57 4dr 185-6 o/d Glendale Green/Turquoise W6 clone
lawn art
57 Stude 259V8 auto. 56 Panhard

joefrazer

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4043
    • View Profile
Re: Engine Conversions
« Reply #68 on: January 11, 2011, 04:57:02 PM »
The planned Kaiser V8 was named the Rapier. It was a 288 cu inch affair that sort of resembled an early 60s Buick nailhead, however, they shared nothing mechanically in common.

HJ-ETEX

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 640
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: Engine Conversions
« Reply #69 on: January 11, 2011, 08:52:29 PM »
dusty - 1956 Ambassadors came with Packard V8s and part way through the model year, an Ambassador Special with the new AMC V8 at 250 c.i. was introduced. This is the engine that is related to the Kaiser V8 proposal. The next year, they put this 250 V8 in the compact Rambler chassis to create the Rebel. This engine was intended for a full size car and came with a Holley 4160 4bbl so it was quite the opposite of what the typical AMC customer expected in 1957-58. The 250 was joined by a 327 in 1958 and sometime after that the 250 was replaced by a 287. When a new line of V8s was introduced for 1966, they came in 290 and 343 sizes and a 390 was added for 1968. By 1970, the sizes got increased to 304, 360, and 401.
The Packard V8 came with Ultramatic (S-P needed to sell transmissions as well as engines.) and the AMC V8 used Borg-Warner automatics. 
GM had more than just the Chevy 307. Buick stopped making V8s in 1979 and a turboV6 wasn't going to satisfy traditional Electra buyers so, Buick started using Olds 307 V8s! Buick had been using Olds, and yes, Chevy V8s and even Pontiac for several years prior to 1979 so the announcement wasn't as a dramatic change to the line up as one might think. 
KFOCI VP 2001-2005
1951 Kaiser Deluxe /327 Chevy
1951 Kaiser Deluxe (no funny stuff)
1968 Kaiser Commando V6
1961 Willys 2WD 134 F-Head SW
1963 Kaiser FC170

Barnum

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 346
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: Engine Conversions
« Reply #70 on: February 03, 2011, 10:09:12 PM »
Jim Lower in California has a 54 Manhattan with a HP 289 C4 tranny, his comment was if he had to do it again he would go GM because of all the converson, but now that it is in the car he wouldn't go back to the 6 cyl  http://www.flickr.com/photos/47203801@N08/5415015066/  http://www.flickr.com/photos/47203801@N08/5414401697/  http://www.flickr.com/photos/47203801@N08/5414401399/
1968 Buick Skylark Convertible
1954 Aero Eagle
Taylor Brugman

Kaiser Ranchero

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 68
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: Engine Conversions
« Reply #71 on: February 05, 2011, 08:12:10 PM »
Nice looking conversion.
51 Business Cpe K5113  49 Virginian K4923      65 GT 350 Retro
52 Ranchero K5127        52 Virginian K5221      03 MACH 1
53 Carolina K5381         53 Manhattan K5324    05 Mustang
                                   54 Manhattan K5421

Barnum

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 346
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: Engine Conversions
« Reply #72 on: February 05, 2011, 10:09:32 PM »
amazingly ,Jim was able to bolt up the stock power steering
1968 Buick Skylark Convertible
1954 Aero Eagle
Taylor Brugman

T Henry

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 1
    • View Profile
Re: Engine Conversions
« Reply #73 on: December 28, 2018, 12:46:32 PM »
Traveler, Regretfully I did a conversion in my '54 Manhattan to a Chev 350 and am still not happy with my fabricated mounts.  This mount assembly off the '57 Corvette... is it available after-market? 

(Tried emailing you but it came back)

r1lark

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 380
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: Engine Conversions
« Reply #74 on: December 28, 2018, 05:46:22 PM »
Traveler, Regretfully I did a conversion in my '54 Manhattan to a Chev 350 and am still not happy with my fabricated mounts.  This mount assembly off the '57 Corvette... is it available after-market? 

(Tried emailing you but it came back)

T Henry, this thread was started in 2007. 'Traveler' has not been active on this site since August 04, 2014. Not trying to discourage you, but just be aware that Traveler may not see your post. Hopefully someone else may be able to answer your question.
Paul
Winston-Salem NC
Visit The Studebaker Skytop Registry website at:  www.studebakerskytop.com