As many of you know, I have been a proponent of standards for the Darrin for years, even before I got the job as Registry Manager I was laughed off the stage in Chicago, and..well I won't go into what happened in Texas. I have worked many many hours on the phone, talking to owners of unrestored cars to determine how they were built. I have driven as long as 4 hours to review an original car. I have had very heated discussions with many who have claimed to know what is correct for the Darrin based upon "experts" who judge them. Additionally, I personally invited the original unrestored car to the Texas Convention so that others could see this gem! Finally, I have been trying to determine breakpoints for certain items that had changed throughout the Darrin builds. This hasn't been very successful. I published "proposed standards" in my Newsletters, asking for comments. I have received 4, as in FOUR, comments in the past 2 years. Nonetheless, I have made the document available to Officers of the Club. I too am very frustrated that these efforts have gone nowhere. At least my list can be used by those who want to restore their cars to the way they were built--based upon data, not heresay.
Terry,
There is The biggest problem with "standards" is that when you start making statements that are "always" and "never" about a car you you are often wrong.
Certain standards can be established with certaintly - i.e. the cars had a fiberglass body. If a car showed up with an aluminum body and a 350 Chevy V8 one would know something was not right. But there are several points of contention with Darrins, that few will ever agree on.
A case in point, we met at the at Iola last year and had a nice conversation and a discussion about my car. I have owned my car, #173 since 1987, when I purchased the car it had just turned over 20,000 miles and was still unrestored. John Haller, the previous owner had the car since 1963 with just 12,000 miles.
My point is that my car has door handles that point to the rear, even in pictures that John had of the car - going back to the early 60's showed the car with rear pointing door handles, you questioned me on the fact. My point being that in the last darrin Newsletter, finally a service bulletin showing that rear pointing door handles are valid, surfaced.
Prior to that bulletin surfacing rear pointing door handles would have been judged "incorrectly" that the car was wrong.
My car has always had the stainless steel gas cap - did the original owner loose the painted one? Or was the plant out of yellow caps and did they need to finish the car and get it out the door to get the car shipped. Believe me - the factory would not hesitate to put a stainless steel cap on the car so it could be loaded on a truck and sent to the door. So int that case what would be correct how the car was built, or the "standard"
Another possibility is the case of dealer installed options?
There are also the questions about running production changes. Etc,
Mitch
P.S. I may not be able to document that my car had a black airsoop, but I think it looks much better with a black scoop vs a yellow one.